This is an old revision of the document!
)Raj, A., & Saxena, P. (2022). Software architectures for autonomous vehicle development: Trends and challenges. IEEE Access, 10, 54321–54345.) </caption>
</figure>
D
ata Management and Scalability
AI-driven autonomy relies on vast datasets for training, simulation, and validation. Managing, labelling, and securing this data is an ongoing challenge
1).
Issues:
* Storage and transfer of multi-terabyte sensor data.
* Bias and imbalance in datasets.
* Traceability of model versions and training data.
Approaches:
* Cloud data lakes with edge pre-processing.
* MLOps workflows for dataset versioning and reproducibility.
* Federated learning for privacy-preserving model updates.
Human–Machine Collaboration and Ethical Oversight
Autonomy software doesn’t exist in isolation — it interacts with human operators, passengers, and society. Thus, software design must incorporate transparency, accountability, and explainability.
Key Considerations:
* Human–machine interface (HMI) design.
* Ethical AI decision frameworks.
* Liability and failover protocols during edge cases.
===== Lifecycle of an Autonomy Software Stack =====
The software lifecycle typically follows a continuous evolution model:
^ Phase ^ Purpose ^ Typical Tools ^
| Design and Simulation | Define architecture, run models, and simulate missions. | MATLAB/Simulink, Gazebo, CARLA, AirSim. |
| Implementation and Integration | Develop and combine software modules. | ROS 2, AUTOSAR, GitLab CI, Docker. |
| Testing and Validation | Perform SIL/HIL and system-level tests. | Jenkins, Digital Twins, ISO safety audits. |
| Deployment | Distribute to field systems with OTA updates. | Kubernetes, AWS Greengrass, Edge IoT. |
| Monitoring and Maintenance | Collect telemetry and update models. | Prometheus, Grafana, ROS diagnostics. |
The goal is continuous evolution with stability, where systems can adapt without losing certification or reliability.