This is an old revision of the document!


)Raj, A., & Saxena, P. (2022). Software architectures for autonomous vehicle development: Trends and challenges. IEEE Access, 10, 54321–54345.) </caption> </figure> Data Management and Scalability AI-driven autonomy relies on vast datasets for training, simulation, and validation. Managing, labelling, and securing this data is an ongoing challenge 1). Issues: * Storage and transfer of multi-terabyte sensor data. * Bias and imbalance in datasets. * Traceability of model versions and training data. Approaches: * Cloud data lakes with edge pre-processing. * MLOps workflows for dataset versioning and reproducibility. * Federated learning for privacy-preserving model updates. Human–Machine Collaboration and Ethical Oversight Autonomy software doesn’t exist in isolation — it interacts with human operators, passengers, and society. Thus, software design must incorporate transparency, accountability, and explainability. Key Considerations: * Human–machine interface (HMI) design. * Ethical AI decision frameworks. * Liability and failover protocols during edge cases. ===== Lifecycle of an Autonomy Software Stack ===== The software lifecycle typically follows a continuous evolution model: ^ Phase ^ Purpose ^ Typical Tools ^ | Design and Simulation | Define architecture, run models, and simulate missions. | MATLAB/Simulink, Gazebo, CARLA, AirSim. | | Implementation and Integration | Develop and combine software modules. | ROS 2, AUTOSAR, GitLab CI, Docker. | | Testing and Validation | Perform SIL/HIL and system-level tests. | Jenkins, Digital Twins, ISO safety audits. | | Deployment | Distribute to field systems with OTA updates. | Kubernetes, AWS Greengrass, Edge IoT. | | Monitoring and Maintenance | Collect telemetry and update models. | Prometheus, Grafana, ROS diagnostics. | The goal is continuous evolution with stability, where systems can adapt without losing certification or reliability.

[1] Baruah, S., Baker, T. P., & Burns, A. (2012). Real-time scheduling theory: A historical perspective. Real-Time Systems, 28(2–3), 101–155
[2] Raj, A., & Saxena, P. (2022). Software architectures for autonomous vehicle development: Trends and challenges. IEEE Access, 10, 54321–54345
[3] Wang, L., Xu, X., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2022). Digital twin-enabled integration in manufacturing. CIRP Annals, 71(1), 105–128.
[4] LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444
[5] Boyens, J., Paulsen, C., Bartol, N., Shankles, S., & Moorthy, R. (2020). NIST SP 800-161: Supply Chain Risk Management Practices for Federal Information Systems and Organizations. National Institute of Standards and Technology
[6] Wang, L., Xu, X., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2022). Digital twin-enabled integration in manufacturing. CIRP Annals, 71(1), 105–128
1)
Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearso
en/safeav/softsys/developmentchalenges.1760703212.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/10/17 12:13 by agrisnik
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
www.chimeric.de Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki do yourself a favour and use a real browser - get firefox!! Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0