This is an old revision of the document!

Internet of Things ready-to-use frameworks play a crucial role in the development of IoT applications by providing firmware for various hardware platforms. It gives the developers the opportunity to create their own devices without the need to write the whole software from scratch. This makes the development of new ideas easier for non-experienced beginners and enthusiasts, in some situations to modify the behaviour of devices available on the market. What is even more important they make it possible to integrate IoT equipment coming from different vendors. There are several IoT frameworks available, with the most popular Tasmota, ESPHome and ESPEasy. All platforms initially were developed for ESP8266 SoCs, but currently, they have been redesigned to support ESP32 and other hardware platforms. Tasmota, ESP Easy, and ESPHome are all firmware options for ESP8266 and ESP32-based devices that simplify the process of configuring and controlling IoT devices. Each of these firmware choices has its own characteristics and use cases. Here's a comparison of Tasmota, ESP Easy, and ESPHome:

Tasmota: Tasmota is popular among DIY enthusiasts and developers who want full control and customization over their devices. It supports a vast variety of sensors and output devices. Tasmota uses a web interface for configuration, making it easy to configure the hardware connection of the microcontroller and peripheral elements. Customization: Tasmota provides extensive scripting capabilities, allowing users to define complex automation rules. Integration: It supports MQTT for integration with home automation platforms like Home Assistant. Community Support: Tasmota has an active and supportive user community. Downsides: Configuration can be daunting for beginners, and extensive customization may require programming skills. ESP Easy:

User Base: ESP Easy is designed for users who want a simplified approach to IoT device configuration and automation. Configuration: It offers a user-friendly web interface for configuring devices with a focus on simplicity. Customization: ESP Easy provides a set of pre-built plugins for common tasks, reducing the need for extensive coding. Integration: It supports MQTT and has some integration capabilities with platforms like Domoticz and OpenHAB. Community Support: While not as large as Tasmota's, ESP Easy has an active community. Downsides: Limited scripting capabilities compared to Tasmota, and it may not be as versatile for advanced users. ESPHome:

User Base: ESPHome is popular among Home Assistant users who want a seamless integration experience. Configuration: It uses a YAML-based configuration, which is highly readable and well-documented. Customization: ESPHome allows users to define device configurations, sensor readings, and automations in a straightforward manner. Integration: It's tightly integrated with Home Assistant, making it an excellent choice for Home Assistant users. Community Support: It benefits from the Home Assistant community, providing strong support. Downsides: Limited support for other home automation platforms, and users not using Home Assistant may find it less versatile. In summary, the choice between Tasmota, ESP Easy, and ESPHome largely depends on your specific needs and familiarity with IoT device configuration:

Tasmota offers extensive customization but might be intimidating for beginners. ESP Easy provides a more user-friendly experience and is suitable for those who want a balance between simplicity and customization. ESPHome is an excellent choice if you are already using Home Assistant, as it seamlessly integrates with it and offers a straightforward YAML-based configuration. Consider your project requirements, your familiarity with these firmware options, and the compatibility with your existing home automation setup when making your choice.