Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| en:av:autonomy_and_autonomous_systems:technology:intelligent_control [2021/06/14 08:38] – agrisnik | en:av:autonomy_and_autonomous_systems:technology:intelligent_control [Unknown date] (current) – external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| < | < | ||
| {{ : | {{ : | ||
| + | |||
| < | < | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 35: | Line 36: | ||
| - | * **Behavioral / Reactive layer** – reactive control, implementing and immediate action as a reaction to stimuli. For instance, if the autonomous system bumps into an obstacle it stops immediately | + | * **Behavioral / Reactive layer** – reactive control, implementing and immediate action as a reaction to stimuli. For instance, if the autonomous system bumps into an obstacle it stops immediately. |
| - | * **Middle layer** – operational control, implements plan execution routines like obstacle avoidance, localization, | + | * **Middle layer** – operational control, implements plan execution routines like obstacle avoidance, localization, |
| - | * **Deliberative layer** – strategic control, implements strategic planning and mission control tasks, like estimating how far the robot is from achieving the mission objectives. In many cases, route planning is implemented in this layer. This layer usually is associated with the intelligence of the system and the main indicator of the level of autonomy; | + | * **Deliberative layer** – strategic control, implements strategic planning and mission control tasks, like estimating how far the robot is from achieving the mission objectives. In many cases, route planning is implemented in this layer. This layer usually is associated with the intelligence of the system and the main indicator of the level of autonomy. |
| It must be emphasized that each of the layers whatever the architecture is selected might be implemented using a different software development approach, different methods and run on different hardware, which is a typical approach in the automotive domain to shrink response times and increase the overall safety of the system and its users. In military and space application different hardware allows increasing the system’s resilience. | It must be emphasized that each of the layers whatever the architecture is selected might be implemented using a different software development approach, different methods and run on different hardware, which is a typical approach in the automotive domain to shrink response times and increase the overall safety of the system and its users. In military and space application different hardware allows increasing the system’s resilience. | ||
